Authors: Shruti Marwaha & A. K. Sinha & Ramesh Sahani
Abstract: The in-hand study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of intervention program on the intelligence quotient, focus factor, decision making ability, creative quotient and academic achievement of students. The longitudinal study was conducted on a sample of 4822 boys and girls aged between 7 and 16 years of age in Chandigarh and Punjab Students of these age groups were the target for the research because this wide range was helpful to analyse the impact of intervention program among respondents of experimental group. In the present research study, socio demographic data sheet, cognitive ability assessment and multiple intelligence scale were used to get the primary quantitative data for further analysis. The procedure involved eleven stages. These stages were followed with the timeline so as to get the reliable findings. The program lasted for around 12 months. During this one year, the respondents in both the groups were assessed 5 times. Academic scores were taken pre and post assessment for analysis. During this time span, a total of 720 customised tasksheets were given to only the respondents belonging to the experimental group while no tasksheet was given to students of the control group. The study found vibrant increase in the cognitive abilities and academic achievement of students.
Keywords: Intelligence Quotient, Focus Factor, Decision Making Ability, Creative Quotient, Academic Achievement, Customised Tasksheets
Download the PDF Document from here.
Abdallah, M. M. S. (2008). Multiple Ways to be Smart: Gardener’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences and its Educational Implications in English Teaching and Oral Communication. Online Submission.
Acharya, A., D. Pal, and, S. Sengupta. 2015. Educational Achievement and Self-Esteem of College Students: A Comparative Study Between The Tribal And Non-Tribal Girl Students Of Agartala. International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies. 14(7).
Bala, I., Kaur, R., & Singh, S. (2017). Decision-making styles and academic achievement. Decision-Making, 2(4).
Das, J. P., Kirby, J. R., & Jarman, R. F. (2013). Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes. Academic Press.
Deshmukh, K. P. M. (2015). Comparison of self-concept of school children belonging to high & low fitness groups. Scientific Committee Members, 275.
Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), 143-155.
Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Castelli, D., Etnier, J. L., Lee, S., Tomporowski, P., … & Szabo-Reed, A. N. (2016). Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(6), 1197.
Dung, N. T., & Tuan, L. T. (2011). Accommodating classroom activities to EFL learners’ multiple intelligences. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 79-109.
Janssen, M., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Rauh, S. P., Toussaint, H. M., Van Mechelen, W., & Verhagen, E. A. L. M. (2014). A short physical activity break from cognitive tasks increases selective attention in primary school children aged 10–11. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 7(3), 129-134.
McFarlane, D. A. (2011). Multiple Intelligences: The Most Effective Platform for Global 21st Century Educational and Instructional Methodologies. College Quarterly, 14(2), n2.
Nuthana, P. G. (2007). Gender analysis of academic achievement among high school students (Doctoral dissertation, UAS, Dharwad).
Saeidi, M. (2009). The implementation of multiple intelligences theory in the classroom: Different ways of learning and teaching.
Soares, D. L., Lemos, G. C., Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). The relationship between intelligence and academic achievement throughout middle school: The role of students’ prior academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 73-78.
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2016). Cognitive psychology. Nelson Education.
Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
Teele, S. (2004). Overcoming barricades to reading: A multiple intelligences approach. Corwin Press.
Temur, O. D. (2007). The Effects of Teaching Activities Prepared According to the Multiple Intelligence Theory on Mathematics Achievements and Permanence of Information Learned by 4th Grade Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(4), 86-91.
Tessier, R. (2018). The Relationship among Creativity, Priming, Cognitive Control, and Interpersonal Intelligence Expression (Doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University).
Thiele, J. E. (2003). Learning patterns of online students. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364-366.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities.
Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the Classroom; What Research Says to the Teacher.
Tudge, J. R., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36(2), 61-81.
Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 57.
Vernon, P. E. (1950). The hierarchy ability. Intelligence and Ability, 179-192.
Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2014). The developmental dynamics between interest, self-concept of ability, and academic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 734-756.
Wajiha, A. H. (2002). Factors affecting academic achievement of IX standard students in mathematics.
Willingham, D. T. (2004). Reframing the mind. Education Next, 4(3).
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 136.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), March 2019, Vol.5, No.3